Wednesday, February 25, 2009

They hate to love us, and they love to hate us....

In Thomas L. Friedman's column: Paging Uncle Sam, taken from The New York Times; the rest of the World still looks to the U.S. for leadership even though the U.S. doesn't feel like it's the superpower it once was.
Friedman gives the reader a straight-forward view of American global leadership. He argues that World leaders often complain that; in this post Cold War, American Power is too strong. However a World without American power is too dangerous to even imagine. A World without American leadership contends Friedman; would be a leaderless World. He breaks down key nations such as Russia, China and the European Union not being able to fill the shoes that America has. His basis for Russia and China is that neither country has the will or a way to provide global public goods that America provides. He explains that the European Union is so at ends with itself that it can't even pass a stimulus package.
Friedman goes further and backs up his point by giving the reader cases in point. One example is the amount the dollar is beginning to gain on global currencies, such as the Korean currency, which has lost nearly 40 % to the dollar in the past six months. This is all because countries are turning to America for leadership during these rough times. They see that the American Government and its citizens HAVE the ability to navigate through the rough waters that face the global economy.
Thomas Friedman's credentials speak for themselves. He is the recipient of three Pulitzer prizes for commentary, all while writing for The New York Times. He has served as chief economic correspondent in the Washington District and before that the chief White House correspondent. It is fair to say that Mr. Friedman knows what he is writing about; in terms of global economics. Mr. Friedman wrote this commentary while in Seoul, South Korea. The commentaries he recieved from Korean economic officials are naturally more biased towards American leadership. Had Mr. Friedman been in Moscow or Beijing the tune might have been a little different. Still though Friedman is right; while Europe can't get along (which is what it does best) and China and Russia entertain the idea that they are gaining ground on the U.S., it is America that is "taking the bull by the horns" so-to-speak. The rest of the World is just watching and waiting to see what comes next.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

To all the Ron Paul Supporters Out There....

After doing the assigned stage two blog assignment and reading my classmate's profiles, I have to admit; it was a little frustrating. I'm not out to change anyone's voting habits, I just want to state my opinion. To all the people who said: I'm a Ron Paul supporter BUT he had no chance at winning, or he wasn't even on the ballot; this blog is especially for you. If you regularly go to Ron Paul's website http://www.campaignforliberty.com/ and you've signed up for his weekly e-mails then you would know that he publiclly endorsed Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party for President.
I can remember the elections of President George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, and I always wondered why people even voted for those smaller...insignificant parties. Only now have I realized why they are so small and insignificant. The lesser of two evils reasoning, the idea that I like this party's politics and I understand where this candidate is coming from, but the bottom line is that he or she just doesn't have a chance in hell at even getting the table scraps of the Republican and Democrat Parties, so I want my vote to count, so I'm voting for this guy. Well I'm here to say that I'll let you vote for "that guy" but my vote is still going to the person who could do the best for our country. It doesn't matter if the candidate gets 1 vote or 1 million votes.
In closing I hope I have not offended anyone in this class. The beauty of this country is that we all have our opinions. I am eager and confident that President Barrack Obama will do the best he can for this country. Perhaps America is not ready for the politics of Ron Paul, I'd like to think that we took a step in the right direction with the man we have in office today, though. So as John Wayne put it once, and Keith Olberman re-stated: I didn't vote for him, but hes my President and I hope he does a good job.

Money Talks...

It's not bombs, it's not chemical or biological agents and it's not al-Qaida that are an immediate threat to the U.S. According to National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair: the economy is the main threat to the U.S.
Mr. Blair cites specific reasons why getting the economy under control is paramount to the nation's security; particularly, strategic interests. If this crisis continues, the U.S.'s economic leadership will be greatly dimenished, allied governments would likely crash as well. While progress is being made in Iraq, the situation is getting worse in Afghanistan. Basiclly it doesn't matter how much progress can be made on the battlefield, if America is no longer the World economic leader, there will be more to pay than just money.
Even though this is considered the opinion of the Nation's Intelligence Director; it should serve as a wake up call to all Americans. Whether or not we're for or against the War on Terror, the time has come where America needs to take a step back and reasses its domestic problems. It should serve without question that America still commands the respect a superpower deserves. How many nations can say that their domestic problems affect the Geopolitical World?